🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 970+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

2004 Upper Deck Vincent Lecavalier #156

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(970 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$1.5
$2.5
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

See pictures for card condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

2004 Upper Deck Vincent Lecavalier #156

See pictures for card condition

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2163828

Category: Toys > Sports Trading Cards > Hockey Trading Cards

Original Price:$2.5 USD

Sale Price:$1.5 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7795 reviews

NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptionally satisfied​
After a few days, the 2004 Upper Deck Vincent Lecavalier #156 feels solid and I don’t regret it. No setup issues.
50 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner
2 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous quality
Honestly, the 2004 Upper Deck Vincent Lecavalier #156 performs as expected and it works for me. Works fine so far.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 days ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific value for money
Fair quality 2004 Upper Deck Vincent Lecavalier #156 considering the price.
5 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
No complaints
So far, it works fine and I’m satisfied.
24 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really splendid
From my experience, it feels solid enough so it’s acceptable.
43 people found this helpful