🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 864+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

SEIKO Watch Set of 5

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(864 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$91.49
$152.48
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Set of 5 gold wristwatches with vintage designs.Untested. Suitable for parts?

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift delivery

↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

SEIKO Watch Set of 5

Set of 5 gold wristwatches with vintage designs.
Untested. Suitable for parts?

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2110967

Category: Women > Women's Accessories > Watches

Original Price:$152.48 USD

Sale Price:$91.49 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4686 reviews
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid choice
The SEIKO Watch Set of 5 has been working without issues so far.
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate it!
Honestly, the SEIKO Watch Set of 5 works fine which feels reasonable.
43 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely superb
Honestly, the SEIKO Watch Set of 5 is better than expected.
45 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
A+ quality
For the price, the SEIKO Watch Set of 5 is practical and it’s fine overall.
42 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb in every way
After a few days, the SEIKO Watch Set of 5 is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.
40 people found this helpful