๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.9/5 from 339+ reviews
Womenโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.9 out of 5(339 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$3.3
$5.5
Sale
โœ“ complimentary delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

None

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping

โ†ฉ๏ธ
easy-to-use Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings

None

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 980258

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price:$5.5 USD

Sale Price:$3.3 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.9
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3285 reviews
JW
Jennifer Wilson โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท San Francisco, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
For the price, the Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings works well enough so no complaints.
7 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 day ago ยท Fresno, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb for my needs
So far, the Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings hasnโ€™t shown any problems.
49 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson
5 months ago ยท fresh York, NY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
magnificent investment
Satisfied with this Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings purchase.
14 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor
1 year ago ยท St. Louis, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
splendid Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings!
The Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings arrived on time.
43 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
purely what I wanted
The Exaggerated Geometric Stainless Steel Unisex Rings is acceptable.
17 people found this helpful