🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 727+ reviews
Menβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(727 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$54.99
$91.65
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalFastening : Concealed flyPockets : Back pocket, side pocketsArticle number : LT122A01U-K14

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift delivery
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash

Rise : Normal
Fastening : Concealed fly
Pockets : Back pocket, side pockets
Article number : LT122A01U-K14

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 912630

Category: Men > Clothing > Jeans

Original Price:$91.65 USD

Sale Price:$54.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 727 reviews
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified
3 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
I don’t regret buying the RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash!
After certain use, the RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash does its job so I’m okay with it. Nothing fancy.
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash!
The RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash is well constructed.
SA​
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash!
Honestly, it does the job which feels reasonable.
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal for RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash
For the price, the RODEN - Straight leg jeans - rainie wash works as described so it’s acceptable.